Impact of bioenergy crop expansion on climate-carbon cycle feedbacks in overshoot scenarios

14Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Stringent mitigation pathways frame the deployment of second-generation bioenergy crops combined with carbon capture and storage (CCS) to generate negative CO2 emissions. This bioenergy with CCS (BECCS) technology facilitates the achievement of the long-term temperature goal of the Paris Agreement. Here, we use five state-of-the-art Earth system models (ESMs) to explore the consequences of large-scale BECCS deployment on the climate-carbon cycle feedbacks under the CMIP6 SSP5-3.4-OS overshoot scenario keeping in mind that all these models use generic crop vegetation to simulate BECCS. First, we evaluate the land cover representation by ESMs and highlight the inconsistencies that emerge during translation of the data from integrated assessment models (IAMs) that are used to develop the scenario. Second, we evaluate the land-use change (LUC) emissions of ESMs against bookkeeping models. Finally, we show that an extensive cropland expansion for BECCS causes ecosystem carbon loss that drives the acceleration of carbon turnover and affects the CO2 fertilization effect- and climate-change-driven land carbon uptake. Over the 2000-2100 period, the LUC for BECCS leads to an offset of the CO2 fertilization effect-driven carbon uptake by 12.2g% and amplifies the climate-change-driven carbon loss by 14.6g%. A human choice on land area allocation for energy crops should take into account not only the potential amount of the bioenergy yield but also the LUC emissions, and the associated loss of future potential change in the carbon uptake. The dependency of the land carbon uptake on LUC is strong in the SSP5-3.4-OS scenario, but it also affects other Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) scenarios and should be taken into account by the IAM teams. Future studies should further investigate the trade-offs between the carbon gains from the bioenergy yield and losses from the reduced CO2 fertilization effect-driven carbon uptake where BECCS is applied.

References Powered by Scopus

The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview

3698Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt

3118Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6

2874Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)-past, present, and future

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Relative benefits of allocating land to bioenergy crops and forests vary by region

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

CMIP6 simulations with the compact Earth system model OSCAR v3.1

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Melnikova, I., Boucher, O., Cadule, P., Tanaka, K., Gasser, T., Hajima, T., … Ciais, P. (2022). Impact of bioenergy crop expansion on climate-carbon cycle feedbacks in overshoot scenarios. Earth System Dynamics, 13(2), 779–794. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-779-2022

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘2405101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 11

55%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

30%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

15%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 12

57%

Environmental Science 6

29%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

10%

Social Sciences 1

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 3
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 14

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0