Mentoring für Studierende in der Medizin: Darstellung und Evaluation eines differenzierten Mentoringprogramms an einer medizinischen Fakultät

7Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In recent years, mentoring programs for medical students have been increasingly implemented in medical schools in Germany. This article describes a voluntary mentoring program for students, which is differentiated into a common mentoring program (AP), a mentoring program for excellent students (EP) and a mentoring plus program (PP) for students with academic difficulties, and its evaluation. The evaluation is based on annual evaluation surveys among the participating mentees, who evaluate the mentoring relationship as well as the impact on their studies. The three student groups differ significantly with regard to sociodemographic variables. The satisfaction with the mentoring program is generally high: 84–94% are mentored by their preferred mentor, the majority assesses the conversational atmosphere as open (78–91%), and 89–98% would recommend participation in the program to others. The programs differ with regard to specific aspects. While PP mentees report the highest ratings on the mentor’s accessibility, trustworthiness and feedback, EP mentees report the highest ratings on the mentor’s competence as well as increased identification with the faculty and early career promotion through the mentoring program. The different assessments of the three programs as well as the generally high acceptance and satisfaction ratings indicate that such a differentiated mentoring program provides a framework of individual support, which is highly appreciated by most students.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bergelt, C., Heinen, I., & Guse, J. (2018, February 1). Mentoring für Studierende in der Medizin: Darstellung und Evaluation eines differenzierten Mentoringprogramms an einer medizinischen Fakultät. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz. Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-017-2674-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free