Creative practice as a tool to build resilience to natural hazards in the Global South

11Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Global South communities are increasingly exposed and vulnerable to natural hazards such as floods and droughts. Preparing for future hazards requires developing an idea of an uncertain future, thinking out of the box for possible solutions, enhancing communication between diverse groups, and instigating organisational and behavioural change. In this study, we explore whether art and creativity could support this process by presenting the results of a literature-mapping exercise and a case study. Our search for journal articles, focusing on Global South communities and topics like environmental issues, hazards, and health, yielded 267 papers published between 2000 and 2018. These used a diversity of art forms, including photography and other forms of visual art, music and song, and drama and storytelling. We found that papers on the topic of climate change generally had lower co-creation (62ĝ€¯% medium to high) than those on health (90ĝ€¯% medium to high). A subset of seven papers focusing on drought and flooding fell into the following two categories: those aiming to raise the general public's awareness of these hazards and those aiming to instigate adaptation action by the participants. In our case study, we explored the middle ground between these categories. In a pilot project in South Africa, we designed storytelling workshops in which community members explored scientific data on future droughts, exchanged ideas between groups, and developed narratives about the impacts of and preparedness for future drought. These narratives were filmed and edited and shared both with the community and with governance actors. We found that this approach allowed participants to imagine future droughts, opened up conversations about potential adaptation measures, encouraged intergenerational exchange, and increased awareness of local issues for policy makers. Both in the wider literature and in our case study, the long-term effects of creative interventions are rarely evaluated. Feedback from participants, however, indicates a number of short-term benefits, which shows the potential of combining creative practice approaches and more conventional approaches into a more holistic preparation for future natural hazards.

References Powered by Scopus

Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as adaptive management

2855Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Resilience: A Bridging Concept or a Dead End? "Reframing" Resilience: Challenges for Planning Theory and Practice Interacting Traps: Resilience Assessment of a Pasture Management System in Northern Afghanistan Urban Resilience: What Does it Mean in Planning Practice? Resilience as a Useful Concept for Climate Change Adaptation? The Politics of Resilience for Planning: A Cautionary Note

1219Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services

927Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Connecting hydrological modelling and forecasting from global to local scales: Perspectives from an international joint virtual workshop

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Geonews: Timely geoscience educational YouTube videos about recent geologic events

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How social movements use religious creativity to address environmental crises in Indonesian local communities

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Loon, A. F., Lester-Moseley, I., Rohse, M., Jones, P., & Day, R. (2020). Creative practice as a tool to build resilience to natural hazards in the Global South. Geoscience Communication, 3(2), 453–474. https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-453-2020

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

59%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

10%

Researcher 3

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 7

35%

Social Sciences 5

25%

Psychology 5

25%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 3

15%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 35

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free