The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in noncirrhotic portal vein thrombosis

67Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Guidelines currently favor Vitamin K antagonists or low-molecular-weight heparins for treatment of noncirrhotic portal vein thrombosis (ncPVT). Use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in PVT has been met with concern because of the lack of data. We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the efficacy and safety of DOACs for the treatment of ncPVT, and to compare them with standard therapies: 330 patients with ncPVT, followed-up for a mean 41.6 months, received warfarin (n = 108), enoxaparin (n = 70), rivaroxaban (n = 65), apixaban (n = 20), dabigatran (n = 8), fondaparinux (n = 2), or no anticoagulation (n = 57). The primary outcome was complete radiographic resolution (CRR) of PVT. Secondary outcomes included recanalization of occlusive PVT, cavernous transformation of the PV, development of chronic portal hypertensive symptoms (cPHS), and major bleeding. DOACs were associated with the highest CRR rates (dabigatran, 6/8 [75%]; apixaban, 13/20 [65%]; rivaroxaban, 42/65 [65%]). Enoxaparin was associated with a CRR rate similar to that of the DOACs (40/70 5 57%). Warfarin was associated with worse outcomes in this regard (CRR rate, 31% [33/108]; hazard ratio [HR] DOACs:warfarin, 2.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.87-4.52; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Naymagon, L., Tremblay, D., Zubizarreta, N., Moshier, E., Troy, K., Schiano, T., & Mascarenhas, J. (2020). The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in noncirrhotic portal vein thrombosis. Blood Advances, 4(4), 655–666. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001310

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free