Comparative Evaluation of Security Fuzzing Approaches

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article compares security fuzzing approaches with respect to different characteristics commenting on their pro and cons concerning both their potential for exposing vulnerabilities and the expected effort required to do so. These preliminary considerations based on abstract reasoning and engineering judgement are subsequently confronted with experimental evaluations based on the application of three different fuzzing tools characterized by diverse data generation strategies on examples known to contain exploitable buffer overflows. Finally, an example inspired by a real-world application illustrates the importance of combining different fuzzing concepts in order to generate data in case fuzzing requires the generation of a plausible sequence of meaningful messages to be sent over a network to a software-based controller as well as the exploitation of a hidden vulnerability by its execution.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al Sardy, L., Neubaum, A., Saglietti, F., & Rudrich, D. (2019). Comparative Evaluation of Security Fuzzing Approaches. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 11699 LNCS, pp. 49–61). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26250-1_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free