Gaps in Emergency General Surgery Coverage in the United States

9Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Despite 3 million adults in the United States being admitted annually for emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions, which disproportionately affect vulnerable populations, we lack an understanding of the barriers to round-the-clock EGS care. Our objective was to measure gaps in round-the-clock EGS care. Methods: From August 2015 to December 2015, we surveyed all US-based adult acute care general hospitals that have an emergency room and ≥1 operating room and provided EGS care, utilizing paper and electronic methods. Surgeons or chief medical officers were queried regarding EGS practices. Results: Of 2811 hospitals, 1634 (58.1%) responded; 279 (17.1%) were unable to always provide round-the-clock EGS care. Rural location, smaller bed size, and nonteaching status were associated with lack of round-the-clock care. Inconsistent surgeon coverage was the primary reason for lacking round-the-clock EGS care (n = 162; 58.1%). However, lack of a tiered system for booking emergency cases, no anesthesia availability overnight, and no stipend for EGS call were also associated with the inability to provide round-the-clock EGS care. Discussion: We found significant gaps in access to EGS care, often attributable to workforce deficiencies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ingraham, A. M., Chaffee, S. M., Ayturk, M. D., Heh, V. K., Kiefe, C. I., & Santry, H. P. (2021). Gaps in Emergency General Surgery Coverage in the United States. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000043

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free