Coping of Chronically-Ill Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparison between Four Groups

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In many countries, the COVID-19 pandemic led to healthcare reorganization limiting access to diagnostic or therapeutic procedures for chronically-ill patients. In this article, we describe the psychological consequences and coping strategies of several groups of chronically-ill patients. During the cross-sectional survey conducted in 2020, we enrolled 398 patients with four different chronic conditions (psoriasis, multiple sclerosis, and patients who have undergone a kidney transplant or received dialysis). The study sample was examined regarding the experienced stress levels (Perceived Stress Scale) and coping strategies (Brief-COPE). All four groups of patients most commonly declared using problem-focused coping strategies and least commonly reported the use of avoidant coping. Higher levels of perceived stress strongly correlated with self-blaming. The participants who declared previous psychiatric treatment or psychotherapy were more likely to use self-blaming, behavioral disengagement, substance use, and avoidant coping, while previous psychotherapy additionally correlated with emotion-focused coping. Group comparison identifies patients with a chronic neurological disease, such as multiple sclerosis, at higher risk of a less beneficial coping profile than kidney transplant recipients. Further focus on education and early interventions in at-risk individuals is needed, and widely targeted mental health programs are indicated in order to improve the mental health of patients suffering from chronic diseases.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Łuc, M., Pawłowski, M., Jaworski, A., Fila-Witecka, K., Szcześniak, D., Augustyniak-Bartosik, H., … Rymaszewska, J. (2023). Coping of Chronically-Ill Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparison between Four Groups. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064814

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free