Institutionalizing Evidence-Informed Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: Lessons From Indonesia

17Citations
Citations of this article
114Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Planning and administering Universal Health Coverage (UHC) policies involve complex and critical decisions, especially in resource-scarce and densely populated settings such as Indonesia. Increasing investments alone do not ensure success and sustainability of UHC, and defining priorities is imperative. In 2013, Indonesia formally embarked on its journey of institutionalizing priority setting with technical assistance from the International Decision Support Initiative (iDSI), which is a global network of organizations in pursuit of evidence-based priority setting. This article provides a perspective for countries in pursuit of institutionalization of evidence-informed policy setting systems and sheds light on the factors conducive to the development of health technology assessment (HTA). It explores the main actors and the context of priority setting in Indonesia and articulates strategies and key outcomes and impact using the theory of change (ToC).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sharma, M., Teerawattananon, Y., Luz, A., Li, R., Rattanavipapong, W., & Dabak, S. (2020). Institutionalizing Evidence-Informed Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: Lessons From Indonesia. Inquiry (United States), 57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958020924920

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free