Characterizing structural uncertainty in decision analytic models: A review and application of methods

132Citations
Citations of this article
175Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The characterization of uncertainty is critical in cost-effectiveness analysis, particularly when considering whether additional evidence is needed. In addition to parameter and methodological uncertainty, there are other sources of uncertainty which include simplifications and scientific judgments that have to be made when constructing and interpreting a model of any sort. These have been classified in a number of different ways but can be referred to collectively as structural uncertainties. Materials and Methods: Separate reviews were undertaken to identify what forms these other sources of uncertainty take and what other forms of potential methods to explicitly characterize these types of uncertainties in decision analytic models. These methods were demonstrated through application to four decision models each representing one of the four types of uncertainty. Results: These sources of uncertainty fall into four general themes: 1) inclusion of relevant comparators; 2) inclusion of relevant events; 3) alternative statistical estimation methods; and 4) clinical uncertainty. Two methods to explicitly characterize such uncertainties were identified: model selection and model averaging. In addition, an alternative approach, adding uncertain parameters to represent the source of uncertainty was also considered. The applications demonstrate that cost-effectiveness may be sensitive to these uncertainties and the methods used to characterize them. The value of research was particularly sensitive to these uncertainties and the methods used to characterize it. It is therefore important, for decision-making purposes, to incorporate such uncertainties into the modeling process. Conclusion: Only parameterizing the uncertainty directly in the model can inform the decision to conduct further research to resolve this source of uncertainty. © 2008, International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR).

References Powered by Scopus

Reversible jump Markov chain monte carlo computation and Bayesian model determination

4372Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bayesian model averaging: A tutorial

3571Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography

1607Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Model parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis: A report of the ISPOR-SMDM modeling good research practices task force working group-6

585Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Model parameter estimation and uncertainty: A report of the ISPOR-SMDM modeling good research practices task force-6

526Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Economic evaluation using decision analytical modelling: Design, conduct, analysis, and reporting

213Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bojke, L., Claxton, K., Sculpher, M., & Palmer, S. (2009). Characterizing structural uncertainty in decision analytic models: A review and application of methods. Value in Health, 12(5), 739–749. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00502.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 73

61%

Researcher 33

28%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 39

48%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 22

27%

Engineering 13

16%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free