Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases: A systematic review

116Citations
Citations of this article
221Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In many patients with brain metastases, the primary therapeutic aim is symptom palliation and maintenance of neurologic function, but in a subgroup, long-term survival is possible. Local control in the brain, and absent or controlled extracranial sites of disease are prerequisites for favorable survival. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a focal, highly precise treatment option with a long track record. Its clinical development and implementation by several pioneering institutions eventually rendered possible cooperative group randomized trials. A systematic review of those studies and other landmark studies was undertaken. Most clinicians are aware of the potential benefits of SRS such as a short treatment time, a high probability of treated-lesion control and, when adhering to typical dose/volume recommendations, a low normal tissue complication probability. However, SRS as sole first-line treatment carries a risk of failure in non-treated brain regions, which has resulted in controversy around when to add whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). SRS might also be prescribed as salvage treatment in patients relapsing despite previous SRS and/or WBRT. An optimal balance between intracranial control and side effects requires continued research efforts. © 2014 Nieder et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nieder, C., Grosu, A. L., & Gaspar, L. E. (2014, July 12). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases: A systematic review. Radiation Oncology. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-155

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free