The length of the fertile window is associated with the chance of spontaneously conceiving an ongoing pregnancy in subfertile couples

52Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The period in each menstrual cycle during which sexual intercourse can result in conception is called the 'fertile window'. Although the fertile window closes on the day of ovulation, little is known about the moment it opens. We defined the first day of normal sperm-mucus interaction as the opening of the fertile window. We hypothesized that length of the fertile window varies between couples and that the number of days the fertile window is 'open' is related to the time to spontaneous conception. Methods: Serial post-coital tests and sperm-mucus penetration tests were performed to detect the first normal sperm-mucus interaction day. Ovulation was confirmed by serial ultrasound. Using Cox' regression analysis, we determined whether the fertile window length was associated with time to ongoing pregnancy. This association was expressed in fecundability ratios (FR). Results: The fertile window length was determined in 410 subfertile couples. The fertile window length varied among couples from <1 to >5 days. The FR increased with increasing fertile window length and varied between 0.11 (95% CI: 0.03-0.45) for a fertile window of 1 day, to 2.4 (95% CI: 1.1-5.2) for a fertile window of 5 days or more. Conclusions: The longer the fertile window in subfertile couples, the higher is the probability of spontaneously conceiving an ongoing pregnancy. © The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Keulers, M. J., Hamilton, C. J. C. M., Franx, A., Evers, J. L. H., & Bots, R. S. G. M. (2007). The length of the fertile window is associated with the chance of spontaneously conceiving an ongoing pregnancy in subfertile couples. Human Reproduction, 22(6), 1652–1656. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem051

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free