Pilot trial of digital breast tomosynthesis (3D mammography) for population-based screening in BreastScreen Victoria

28Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate detection measures for tomosynthesis and standard mammography; to assess the feasibility of using tomosynthesis in population-based screening for breast cancer. Design, setting: Prospective pilot trial comparing tomosynthesis (with synthesised 2D images) and standard mammography screening of women attending Maroondah BreastScreen, a BreastScreen Victoria service in the eastern suburbs of Melbourne. Participants: Women at least 40 years of age who presented for routine breast screening between 18 August 2017 and 8 November 2018. Main outcome measures: Cancer detection rate (CDR); proportion of screens that led to recall for further assessment. Results: 5018 tomosynthesis and 5166 standard mammography screens were undertaken in 10 146 women; 508 women (5.0% of screens) opted not to undergo tomosynthesis screening. With tomosynthesis, 49 cancers (40 invasive, 9 in situ) were detected (CDR, 9.8 [95% CI, 7.2–13] per 1000 screens); with standard mammography, 34 cancers (30 invasive, 4 in situ) were detected (CDR, 6.6 [95% CI, 4.6–9.2] per 1000 screens). The estimated difference in CDR was 3.2 more detections (95% CI, –0.32 to 6.8) per 1000 screens with tomosynthesis; the difference was greater for repeat screens and for women aged 60 years or more. The recall rate was greater for tomosynthesis (4.2%; 95% CI, 3.6–4.8%) than standard mammography (3.0%; 95% CI, 2.6–3.5%; estimated difference, 1.2%; 95% CI, 0.46–1.9%). The median screen reading time for tomosynthesis was 67 seconds (interquartile range [IQR] 46–105 seconds); for standard mammography, 16 seconds (IQR, 10–29 seconds). Conclusions: Breast cancer detection, recall for assessment, and screen reading time were each higher for tomosynthesis than for standard mammography. Our preliminary findings could form the basis of a large scale comparative evaluation of tomosynthesis and standard mammography for breast screening in Australia. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12617000947303.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Houssami, N., Lockie, D., Clemson, M., Pridmore, V., Taylor, D., Marr, G., … Macaskill, P. (2019). Pilot trial of digital breast tomosynthesis (3D mammography) for population-based screening in BreastScreen Victoria. Medical Journal of Australia, 211(8), 357–362. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50320

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free