A complementary understanding of residential energy demand, consumption and services

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This chapter explores potential ways to implement, and benefits for policymaking of, the complementary use of two different types of modelling for analysing residential energy consumption and ethnographic research. The more traditional approach of techno-economic modelling is considered alongside agent-based modelling that incorporates both causal and intentional relationships; ethnographic approaches provide 'thick understanding' of the relationships between social and technical elements and the environment. In doing so, the chapter builds on real examples from academic-policy engagement in the EU on energy demand, consumption and services. We examine three myths of the role of modelling in policymaking and propose practical ways of employing different types of modelling in a complementary way to increase policymakers' understanding of residential energy demand, consumption and services. Finally, we make three concrete recommendations for developing future interdisciplinary work on integrating social and technical models for informing policy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hiteva, R., Ives, M., Weijnen, M., & Nikolic, I. (2018). A complementary understanding of residential energy demand, consumption and services. In Advancing Energy Policy: Lessons on the Integration of Social Sciences and Humanities (pp. 111–127). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99097-2_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free