Coordinating goals, preferences, options, and analyses for the stanford living laboratory feasibility study

14Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper describes an initial application of Multi-Attribute Collective Decision Analysis for a Design Initiative (MACDADI) on the feasibility study of a mixed-use facility. First, observations of the difficulties the design team experienced communicating their goals, preferences, options, and analyses are presented. Next, the paper describes a formal intervention by the authors, integrating survey, interview, and analytic methods. The project team collected, synthesized, and hierarchically organized their goals; stakeholders' established their relative preferences with respect to these goals; the design team formally rated the design options with respect to the goals; the project team then visualized and assessed the goals, options, preferences, and analyses to assist in a transparent and formal decision making process. A discussion of some of the strengths and weaknesses of the MACDADI process is presented and opportunities for future improvement are identified. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haymaker, J., & Chachere, J. (2006). Coordinating goals, preferences, options, and analyses for the stanford living laboratory feasibility study. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4200 LNAI, pp. 320–327). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/11888598_30

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free