Use of an automated software module for monthly routine Machine QA tests

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The goal of this work is to investigate the feasibility of implementing an automated module of a commercial software for monthly routine Linac QA tests. The AAPM TG 142 report is a reference document which includes recommendations for general Quality Assurance (QA) tests for medical linear accelerators. DoseLab software includes an AutoQA module for users to run TG-142's Machine QA tests in an automated sequence. The execution of the individual monthly tests (without DoseLab) is compared with AutoQA in terms of time consuming, reproducibility, additional data and user friendliness. The total time required was 195 minutes for single test mode, without DoseLab, and 80 minutes for AutoQA. Auto QA allows the user to analyze more parameters than single-test mode, especially for kV and MV images. Different profiles in sizes and energies are examined in minor time. The Winston-Lutz test is more quickly and complete. CBCT QA test is less laborious and no user-dependent. Reproducibility of results is verified: the coefficient of variation over 5 consecutive repeated measurements is less than 5%. The software database makes it possible to monitor the trend of different parameters over time. AutoQA module significantly reduces the time spent for QA. It also allows to get more quantitative informations and delete the user-dependent uncertainties.

References Powered by Scopus

Task group 142 report: Quality assurance of medical acceleratorsa

1260Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A system for stereotactic radiosurgery with a linear accelerator

626Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quality assurance for image-guided radiation therapy utilizing CT-based technologies: A report of the AAPM TG-179

257Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

An automated quality assurance system with deep learning for small cube-ball phantom localization in noisy megavoltage images

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Validation and Efficiency Evaluation of Automated Quality Assurance Software SunCHECK™ Machine for Mechanical and Dosimetric Quality Assurance

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bonanno, E., Borzì, G., Cavalli, N., Pace, M., Stella, G., Zirone, L., & Marino, C. (2023). Use of an automated software module for monthly routine Machine QA tests. Journal of Instrumentation, 18(7). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/18/07/T07010

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘2502468

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0