The smallest grammar problem revisited

18Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In a seminal paper of Charikar et al. on the smallest grammar problem, the authors derive upper and lower bounds on the approximation ratios for several grammar-based compressors, but in all cases there is a gap between the lower and upper bound. Here we close the gaps for LZ78 and BISECTION by showing that the approximation ratio of LZ78 is Θ((n/ log n)2/3), whereas the approximation ratio of BISECTION is Θ((n/ log n)1/2). We also derive a lower bound for a smallest grammar for a word in terms of its number of LZ77-factors, which refines existing bounds of Rytter. Finally, we improve results of Arpe and Reischuk relating grammar-based compression for arbitrary alphabets and binary alphabets.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hucke, D., Lohrey, M., & Reh, C. P. (2016). The smallest grammar problem revisited. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9954 LNCS, pp. 35–49). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46049-9_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free