Advancing Value Pluralist Approaches to Social Policy Controversies: A Case Study of Welfare Conditionality

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

'Value pluralism' is a strand of analytical philosophy that posits the plurality of morally significant values. By enabling systematic mapping of the diversity of moral registers within which social policy concerns might legitimately be considered, we contend that value pluralist-inspired analysis can aid constructive policy dialogue. Our argument is founded on four claims: first, as a matter of normative principle, value pluralism represents a defensible ethical standpoint; second, as a matter of fact, people are attracted to a plurality of moral values; third, as a matter of democratic legitimacy, pluralism offers a means of (partially) reconciling rival moral claims; fourth, as a matter of political strategy, pluralism offers a pragmatic approach that can engage protagonists on their own terms. To demonstrate its efficacy, we apply this pluralist approach to the vexed question of welfare conditionality, which we interrogate via six normative perspectives (rights, utilitarianism, contractualism, communitarianism, paternalism and social justice).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Watts-Cobbe, B., & Fitzpatrick, S. (2023). Advancing Value Pluralist Approaches to Social Policy Controversies: A Case Study of Welfare Conditionality. Journal of Social Policy, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279423000065

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free