Can high-risk patients after myocardial infarction participate in comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation?

16Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Patients with large transmural infarctions (MI) and signs of congestive heart failure (CHF) are often excluded from physical training, because of the risk of malignant arrhythmia or cadiac overloading. From a non-selected MI population <65 years we enrolled 37 high-risk patients in a two-year comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation programme, including health education, follow-up at a post-MI clinic, and physical training in outpatient groups. The feasibility, effectiveness and safety of the physical training were evaluated: Twenty-one patients joined the physical training and participated with excellent compliance, reaching the preset levels of training. No adverse effects occurred during the 921 training sessions. The high-risk patients were compared with the remaining 228 patients and a subgroup of 86 low-risk patients with regard to mortality, morbidity, medication, effect on risk factors, exercise test performance and rate of return to work. The high-risk group showed a higher mortality (27.0 vs. 10.4%, p<0.05), a lower maximal work capacity at the exercise test 4 months after MI (126 W vs. 140 W, p<0.05), and a lower rate of early return to work (22.6 vs. 50% p<0.01) when compare with the low risk group. However, they showed a similar improvement in exercise test parameters. At the end of the programme a remarkable 63% had returned to work vs. 48.2% of the remaining patients. The reduction in smoking and the effect on blood pressure were equal in both groups. It is concluded that high-risk patients may well benefit from regular physical training in outpatient groups, if adequate medical supervision is available.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hedback, B., & Perk, J. (1990). Can high-risk patients after myocardial infarction participate in comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation? Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 22(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.2340/1650197919901520

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free