Pooled nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal samples for the identification of respiratory viruses in adults

12Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A pooled sample of oropharyngeal swabs, nasopharyngeal swabs and nasopharyngeal washings, taken from each of 1,000 subjects, was compared to separate specimens from the same sampling. Multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (mqRT-PCR) was used to identify 12 respiratory viruses. Two hundred and forty-three (97%) of the 251 viruses identified in the separate samples were also identified in the mixed samples. The sensitivity rate was identical at 100% for all virus groups except coronaviruses. This sensitivity rate clearly justifies the use of pooled samples instead of separate samples for clinical and epidemiological purposes. The reduction in costs attained from the use of pooled samples may represent a critical advantage when considering its use in extensive clinical and epidemiological studies. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lieberman, D., Lieberman, D., Shimoni, A., Keren-Naus, A., Steinberg, R., & Shemer-Avni, Y. (2010). Pooled nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal samples for the identification of respiratory viruses in adults. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 29(6), 733–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-0903-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free