Ego-depletion or invigoration in solving the tower of Hanoi? Action orientation helps overcome planning deficits

5Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Personality systems interaction (PSI) theory postulates two executive control modes: Self-control and self-regulation. Self-control, typical of state oriented persons, should result in “ego depletion” whereas self-regulation, typical of action oriented persons, should result in invigoration. State- and action-oriented participants performed the Plan-a-Day and the 5-disk Tower-of-Hanoi tasks. There were no differences between them on the first task, but action had better performance than state oriented in terms of number of moves and solution time on the second task, independently of differences in self-determination. Better performance in the Tower of Hanoi correlated positively with activation, and negatively with apathy. We conclude that whereas self-control is associated with depletion, self-regulation is associated with invigoration in performing the Tower of Hanoi task.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kazén, M., & Kuhl, J. (2020). Ego-depletion or invigoration in solving the tower of Hanoi? Action orientation helps overcome planning deficits. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00770-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free