Computational fluid dynamics investigation of human aspiration in low-velocity air: Orientation effects on mouth-breathing simulations

23Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics was used to investigate particle aspiration efficiency in low-moving air typical of occupational settings (0.1-0.4 m s -1). Fluid flow surrounding an inhaling humanoid form and particle trajectories traveling into the mouth were simulated for seven discrete orientations relative to the oncoming wind (0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, 90°, 135° and 180°). Three continuous inhalation velocities (1.81, 4.33, and 12.11 m s-1), representing the mean inhalation velocity associated with sinusoidal at-rest, moderate, and heavy breathing (7.5, 20.8, and 50.3 l min-1, respectively) were simulated. These simulations identified a decrease in aspiration efficiency below the inhalable particulate mass (IPM) criterion of 0.5 for large particles, with no aspiration of particles 100 m and larger for at-rest breathing and no aspiration of particles 116 m for moderate breathing, over all freestream velocities and orientations relative to the wind. For particles smaller than 100 m, orientation-averaged aspiration efficiency exceeded the IPM criterion, with increased aspiration efficiency as freestream velocity decreased. Variability in aspiration efficiencies between velocities was low for small (<22 m) particles, but increased with increasing particle size over the range of conditions studied. Orientation-averaged simulation estimates of aspiration efficiency agree with the linear form of the proposed linear low-velocity inhalable convention through 100 m, based on laboratory studies using human mannequins. © 2013 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anthony, T. R., & Anderson, K. R. (2013). Computational fluid dynamics investigation of human aspiration in low-velocity air: Orientation effects on mouth-breathing simulations. Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 57(6), 740–757. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mes108

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free