A tale of two approaches: Query performance study of XML storage strategies in relational databases

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Several recent papers have investigated a relational approach to store XML data and there is a growing evidence that schema-conscious approaches are a better option than schema-oblivious techniques as far as query performance is concerned. This paper studies three strategies for storing XML document including one representing schema-conscious approach (SHARED-INLINING) and two representing schema-oblivious approach (XParent and SUCXENT++). We implement and evaluate each approach using benchmark non-recursive XQueries. Our analysis shows an interesting fact that schema-conscious approaches are not always a better option than schema-oblivious approaches! In fact, it is possible for a schema-oblivious approach (SUCXENT++) to be faster than a schema-conscious approach (SHARED-INLINING) for 55% of the benchmark queries (the highest observed factor being 87.8 times). SUCXENT++ also outperforms XParent by up to 1700 times. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prakash, S., & Bhowmick, S. S. (2006). A tale of two approaches: Query performance study of XML storage strategies in relational databases. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4080 LNCS, pp. 149–160). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/11827405_15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free