Frame- And Entity-Based Knowledge for Common-Sense Argumentative Reasoning

19Citations
Citations of this article
96Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Common-sense argumentative reasoning is a challenging task that requires holistic understanding of the argumentation where external knowledge about the world is hypothesized to play a key role. We explore the idea of using event knowledge about prototypical situations from FrameNet and fact knowledge about concrete entities from Wikidata to solve the task. We find that both resources can contribute to an improvement over the non-enriched approach and point out two persisting challenges: first, integration of many annotations of the same type, and second, fusion of complementary annotations. After our explorations, we question the key role of external world knowledge with respect to the argumentative reasoning task and rather point towards a logic-based analysis of the chain of reasoning.

References Powered by Scopus

WordNet: A Lexical Database for English

11721Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference

2551Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modeling relations and their mentions without labeled text

1053Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Argumentation and explainable artificial intelligence: A survey

122Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Commonsense Knowledge Enhanced Memory Network for Stance Classification

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Scientia Potentia Est—On the Role of Knowledge in Computational Argumentation

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Botschen, T., Sorokin, D., & Gurevych, I. (2018). Frame- And Entity-Based Knowledge for Common-Sense Argumentative Reasoning. In EMNLP 2018 - Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Argument Mining (pp. 90–96). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w18-5211

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 31

70%

Researcher 9

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

7%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 40

78%

Linguistics 6

12%

Engineering 3

6%

Social Sciences 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0