Haemodynamic effects of riociguat in cteph and pah: A 10-year observational study

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Long-term treatment with riociguat has been shown to enhance exercise capacity in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and inoperable or persistent/recurrent chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). This study sought to evaluate the long-term haemodynamic effects of riociguat in patients with PAH and inoperable CTEPH. Methods During this single-centre long-term observational study, riociguat was administered at a three-times-daily dose of up to 2.5 mg. The primary outcome was pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). The secondary outcomes included mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP), cardiac index, mortality, clinical worsening events, 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and World Health Organization functional class (WHO FC). Results 37 patients (CTEPH n=19; PAH n=18) were included. The median follow-up period was 96 months. The survival estimates for all the patients at 1/3/5/8 years were 0.97/0.86/0.72/0.61, without significant differences between patients with CTEPH and PAH. At the final data cut-off, PVR decreased (1232±462 dyn·s·cm–5 versus 835±348 dyn·s·cm–5, p<0.001), cardiac index increased (1.7±0.4 L·min−1·m −2 versus 2.4±0.5 L·min−1·m −2, p<0.001), 6MWD increased by 43.1±59.6 m, and WHO FC improved/stabilised/worsened in 40%/35%/25% of patients versus baseline. Improvement in PAP was not shown. Compared with patients in WHO FC I/II and III/IV at baseline, the 8-year clinical worsening-free survival estimates were 0.51 versus 0.19 (p=0.026). Conclusions Riociguat improved PVR and cardiac index for up to 8 years, but not PAP. WHO FC may have certain predictive value for the long-term prognosis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, S., Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., Kuang, T., Gong, J., Li, J., … Miao, R. (2021). Haemodynamic effects of riociguat in cteph and pah: A 10-year observational study. ERJ Open Research, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00082-2021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free