Susceptibility to scrapie and disease phenotype in sheep: Cross-PRNP genotype experimental transmissions with natural sources

40Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It has long been established that the sheep Prnp genotype influences the susceptibility to scrapie, and some studies suggest that it can also determine several aspects of the disease phenotype. Other studies, however, indicate that the source of infection may also play a role in such phenotype. To address this question an experiment was set up in which either of two different natural scrapie sources, AAS from AA136 Suffolk and VVC from VV136 Cheviot sheep, were inoculated into AA136, VA136 and VV136 sheep recipients (n = 52). The immunohistochemical (IHC) profile of disease-associated PrP (PrPd) accumulation in the brain of recipient sheep was highly consistent upon codon 136 homologous and semi-homologous transmission, but could be either similar to or different from those of the inoculum donors. In contrast, the IHC profiles were highly variable upon heterologous transmission (VVC to AA136 and AAS to VV136). Furthermore, sheep of the same Prnp genotype could exhibit different survival times and PrPd profiles depending on the source of infection, and a correlation was observed between IHC and Western blot profiles. It was found that additional polymorphisms at codons 112 or 141 of AA136 recipients resulted in a delayed appearance of clinical disease or even in protection from infection. The results of this study strongly suggest that the scrapie phenotype in sheep results from a complex interaction between source, donor and recipient factors, and that the Prnp genotype of the recipient sheep does not explain the variability observed upon codon 136 heterologous transmissions, arguing for other genetic factors to be involved. © 2012 Gonzalez et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Figures

  • Table 1 Experimental design
  • Figure 1 Diagramatic representation of the global outcome of the experiment (excluding ARQ/ARR recipients and environmental controls). A: transmissions with AAS inoculum. B: transmissions with VVC inoculum. Survival times in days (dpi) of AAS and VVC inoculum donors (red and blue squares, respectively), and of ARQ/ARQ (AA, red if Suffolk, orange if Cheviot), VRQ/ARQ (VA, pink, all Cheviot) and VRQ/VRQ (VV, blue, all Cheviot) recipients, challenged by the oral (triangles) or subcutaneous (circles) route. In white, PrPd-positive sheep dying from intercurrent conditions or culled for welfare reasons (all of them Cheviot in the case of AAS inoculum and Suffolk in the case of VVC inoculum). Black circle and triangles, four sheep (two Cheviot and two Suffolk) culled at the end of the experiment which resulted completely negative for PrPd and PrPres by IHC and WB, respectively. Dotted lines split sheep with additional polymorphisms at codons either 112 (MT, Suffolk) or 141 (LF, Cheviot) from MMLL sheep (with no additional polymorphisms). Numbers next to each symbol correspond to sheep identification numbers in Additional file 2.
  • Table 2 Statistical analysis of differences in survival times
  • Figure 2 Profiles of PrPd accumulation in the brain of inocula donors profiles (A), which are characterized by prominent extracellular deposits, pa vascular and perivacuolar, as illustrated in B; inset, detail of peri-vascular C, D: VVC: note slight more variable and clearly different profiles (C) than cortex (X type, as illustrated in D; inset, detail of intramural and perivasc antibody and haematoxylin counterstaining. Original magnifications: large ITGL: intraglial; GLAS: glia-associated extracellular; NRPL: extracellular in gr see text. Y-axis indicates proportion of the different PrPd types.
  • Figure 3 Profiles of PrPd accumulation in the brain of recipients of either AAS (A-C) or VVC (D-F) inoculum. Individual profiles that show high degree of similarity are identified by the same colour (red, type A; pink, type A’; green, type M; light blue, type M’; gold, type U; orange, type U’; black, type P; brown, type CH). Note the high degree of variability amongst recipients of codon 136 heterologous transmissions (C and F), which contrasts with the consistency of profiles amongst homologous and semi-homologous transmissions recipients for both AAS (A and B) and VVC (D and E) inocula. PrPd types (X-axis) are: ITNR: intraneuronal; ITGL: intraglial; GLAS: glia-associated extracellular; NRPL: extracellular in grey matter neuropil; OTHR: other types. For more detailed description see text. Y-axis indicates proportion of the different PrPd types.
  • Figure 4 Examples of the brain PrPd profile types encountered in different transmission groups. A: recipient AAS1: type A profile in cerebral cortex (note similarities with Figure 2a); inset, recipient AAS10 (type A) illustrating the absence of intracellular PrPd in deep cerebellar nuclei despite the presence of abundant extracellular aggregates. B: recipient AAS17: type A’ profile in corpus striatum: peri-vascular PrPd in capsula interna and abundant extracellular (peri-neuronal, linear and particulate) PrPd in neuropil but inconspicuous intraneuronal PrPd in deep cerebellar nuclei (inset, same recipient). C: recipient VVC11 (type M’) showing co-occurrence of extracellular (linear, perineurinal, particulate and coalescing) and intraneuronal PrPd in corpus striatum; inset: recipient VVC12 showing the same co-occurrence of intra- and extra-cellular PrPd in deep cerebellar nuclei (type M'). D: recipient VVC1: type M profile with almost complete absence of extracellular glia-associated PrPd and some neuropil-associated and intracellular aggregates in deep cerebral cortex layers; inset, same recipient showing abundant intraneuronal PrPd in deep cerebellar nuclei. E: recipient VVC13 (type P profile) showing abundant extracellular PrPd in the neuropil of the thalamus and prominent non-vascular, Kuru-type plaques (detail in inset). F: recipient VVC14 (type CH profile) showing conspicuous intracellular PrPd deposits in Purkinje cells and in neurons and glial cells within the red nucleus (inset). IHC with R145 PrP monoclonal antibody and haematoxylin counterstaining. Original magnifications: large images × 4 (except F, ×10); insets × 60.
  • Figure 5 Illustrative Western blot with P4 and SAF84 antibodies in sa Additional file 2. The IHC profile types for each brain are provided at the b profile.
  • Figure 6 Molecular characteristics of PrPres (WB with P4 antibody) in obex samples. Sheep recipients of the different transmission groups are colour-coded to match the IHC profiles shown in Figure 3. A: Molecular weights (MWs in kDa) of the unglycosylated band: note the association between AAS inoculum (circles), A and A’ PrPd profiles (red and pink, respectively) and generally lower MWs, and between VVC inoculum (squares), M and M’ IHC profiles (green and light blue, respectively) and generally higher MWs (for statistical analysis refer to text). B: Triplot representation of the glycoprofiles as proportion of unglycosylated (ung., green scale and grid), monoglycosylated (monog, black scale and grid) and diglycosylated band (dig, blue scale and grid): note that 11 of 12 sheep with M or M’ IHC profiles have more than 26% of unglycosylated PrPres, whereas 18 of 23 with A or A’ PrPd profiles have 26% or less unglycosylated PrPres (dotted green line). Similarly, 11 of 12 sheep with M or M’ IHC profiles have less than 43% of diglycosylated PrPres, whereas 15 of 23 with A or A’ PrPd profiles have 43% or more diglycosylated PrPres (dotted blue line). For statistical analyses refer to text. The only one sheep with a CH type of PrPd profile (see Figure 3) is not represented as it did not react with P4 antibody in the WB.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

González, L., Jeffrey, M., Dagleish, M. P., Goldmann, W., Sisá, S., Eaton, S. L., … Chianini, F. (2012). Susceptibility to scrapie and disease phenotype in sheep: Cross-PRNP genotype experimental transmissions with natural sources. Veterinary Research, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9716-43-55

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

60%

Researcher 6

30%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8

42%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 6

32%

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 3

16%

Neuroscience 2

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0