Are sleep studies worth doing?

27Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims - To evaluate a sleep study service for children suspected of having sleep related upper airway obstruction (SRUAO). Design - Prospective survey. Setting - Paediatric and ear, nose, and throat clinics of the Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust. Subjects - Consecutively referred children with SRUAO symptoms. Main outcome measures - Sleep study data, referring clinician's impression, and completed symptom questionnaires. Results - A total of 120 children (aged 6 months to 15.5 years) were studied. Study scores showed that 24 were classified as normal, 42 as mild, 33 as moderates and 21 as severe SRUAO. In the 106 cases with matching data between clinician's impression and study scores 71 had good agreement, 18 were underestimated by the clinician, and 17 were over estimated. No cases reported as moderate or severe sleep apnoea by the study were referred by the clinician as normal. There were no important associations between parental symptom scores and sleep study scores. Conclusion - In children with suspected SRUAO, sleep studies do contribute to assessing the need for operations the likelihood of postoperative respiratory failure, or as a baseline or outcome measure in intervention studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Someren, V., Burmester, M., Alusi, G., & Lane, R. (2000). Are sleep studies worth doing? Archives of Disease in Childhood, 83(1), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.83.1.76

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free