Attitudes of health care professionals towards COVID-19 vaccine - a sequence from Turkey

11Citations
Citations of this article
97Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the attitudes of healthcare professionals toward the COVID −19 vaccine, which has been introduced to healthcare professionals at the beginning of 2021 and give information to them on the disease and vaccine. This cross-sectional analytical study has been performed by conducting an online survey to the healthcare professionals who work at the healthcare institutions in the province of Samsun in Turkey between December 2020 and January 2021. In addition to sixteen questions about the demographic characteristics, the “Attitudes towards the COVID −19 vaccine” scale has been used. MANOVA test and Spearman rho correlation coefficient were used in analytical examinations. A total of 1426 healthcare professional have been reached. 64.3% of participants were female, 44.1% were nurse/midwife and 66.6% were public employees. Regarding the questions in the sub-dimension of positive attitude, the rate of response of “I agree/I strongly agree” was between 40.6% and 54.6%. Positive attitude mean values differ according to gender, age, institution, presence of children, smoking status, being a relative who died due to COVID −19, and profession (respectively p < .001, p < .001, p < .001, p < .001, p = .002, p = .019, p < .001). It has been observed that positive and negative attitudes toward COVID −19 vaccination are almost equally distributed and some demographic factors affect the attitude. The opinions of healthcare professionals on the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine, which are the main elements of the vaccination effort, may affect the public perception of vaccination.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oruç, M. A., & Öztürk, O. (2021). Attitudes of health care professionals towards COVID-19 vaccine - a sequence from Turkey. Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics, 17(10), 3377–3383. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1928462

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free