Energy consumption characterization in precision hard machining using CBN cutting tools

27Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this paper, the contribution of tool wear to the energy balance was determined for precision hard turning using chamfered CBN cutting tools. The tool nose wear VBC and the corresponding changes of component forces Fc, Ff and Fp resulting from tool wear evolution were continuously measured during wear tests. Based on the cutting mechanics, specific cutting and ploughing energies were calculated for a number of tool wear states. In particular, changes of energy balance due to tool wear under variable feed rate, depth of cut and tool nose radius were discussed. A distinction between material removal conditions resulting from precision cutting and grinding at a very low uncut chip thickness is considered.

References Powered by Scopus

Advancing cutting technology

567Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cutting of hardened steel

469Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Advanced Machining Processes of Metallic Materials

319Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Advances in material and friction data for modelling of metal machining

235Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Investigation of tool wear in the turning of Inconel 718 superalloy in terms of process performance and productivity enhancement

153Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Determination of energy consumption during turning of hardened stainless steel using resultant cutting force

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grzesik, W., Denkena, B., Żak, K., Grove, T., & Bergmann, B. (2016). Energy consumption characterization in precision hard machining using CBN cutting tools. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 85(9–12), 2839–2845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8091-1

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

61%

Researcher 4

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 22

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free