Are delay and interval effects the same anomaly in the context of intertemporal choice in finance?

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Traditionally, the interval and delay effects have been identified and considered as the same anomaly in the context of intertemporal choice, when individuals or groups of individuals make their decisions about reward preferences. This has supposed that most studies on this topic have been focused on the delay effect and, consequently, that the discount functions provided by the existing literature have considered only this effect. This is the case of hyperbolic discounting, which has been used to describe the delay, but not the interval effect. Therefore, the main objective of this paper is to carry out a detailed analysis of both anomalies, which will allow us to mathe-matically relate them, thus finding their analogies and differences. To do this, we will first analyze the concept of delay effect and later the different definitions of the interval effect. The main con-clusion of this paper is twofold. On the one hand, if the benchmark for valuation is fixed, the delay effect coincides with the so‐called decreasing interval effect. On the other hand, if the assessment reference point is the beginning of each interval, both anomalies are different. These findings make necessary to redefine the concept of interval effect. Finally, we will analyze the relationship between the interval effect, the delay effect and the subadditivity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cruz Rambaud, S., & Ortiz Fernández, P. (2020). Are delay and interval effects the same anomaly in the context of intertemporal choice in finance? Symmetry, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13010041

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free