Rhetoric of Risk

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Some individuals can’t bear the thought of a transhuman future. They can’t see a place for themselves among the transcended and transformed. Nor can they see transhumanity supporting their beliefs and values. They feel an anticipatory anomie—an expectation of being displaced from a changing culture and society. The possibility of physical harm, the type of risk that comes quickest to mind, is not a primary consideration. In other words, absent personal risk they still would oppose transhumanity. Others can’t bear the thought of a future without transhumanity. Their hope for self-transformation is kept alive by this prospect. It would be better if risks were low, but they would accept elevated risks in light of expected rich returns.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lilley, S. (2013). Rhetoric of Risk. In SpringerBriefs in Philosophy (pp. 41–60). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4981-8_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free