Dualisms and the Myth of Mental Illness

  • Thomas P
  • Bracken P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

What does it mean to `de-medicalize misery'? Does it mean that we should no longer think of states of despair, sadness and madness in medical terms? Does it mean that there is no proper role for doctors in trying to work with and help those so afflicted? And if that is so, then what is to be done about the systems that Western societies have set up to help, such as mental health and primary care services, all of which are predicated on the assumption that misery and madness are, among other things, medical conditions? Are all these to be dismantled? If so, what should take their place? These are not rhetorical questions; they serve the point of drawing attention to the fact that words have important consequence, if we mean what we say.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thomas, P., & Bracken, P. (2011). Dualisms and the Myth of Mental Illness. In De-Medicalizing Misery (pp. 10–26). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230342507_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free