The Invisibility of Scotomas I: The Carving Hypothesis

2Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

SIGNIFICANCE Veridical depictions of scene appearance with scotomas allow better understanding of the impact of field loss and may improve the development and implementation of rehabilitation. Explanation and depiction of the invisibility of scotoma may lead to patients' understanding and thus better compliance with related treatments. PURPOSE Simulations of perception with scotomas guide training, patient education, and rehabilitation research. Most simulations incorrectly depict scotomas as black patches, although the scotomas and the missing contents are usually invisible to patients. We present a novel approach to capture the reported appearance of scenes with scotomas. METHODS We applied a content-aware image resizing algorithm to carve out the content elided under the scotomas. With video sequences, we show how and why eye movements fail to increase the visibility of the carved scotomas. RESULTS Numerous effects, reported by patients, emerge naturally from the scotoma carving. Carving-eliminated scotomas over natural images are barely visible, despite causing substantial distortions. Low resolution and contrast sensitivity at farther eccentricities and saccadic blur reduce the visibility of the distortions. In a walking scenario, static objects moving smoothly to the periphery disappear into and then reemerge out of peripheral scotomas, invisibly. CONCLUSIONS Scotoma carving provides a viable hypothetical simulation of vision with scotomas due to loss of neurons at the retinal ganglion cell level and higher. As a hypothesis, it generates predictions that lend themselves to future clinical testing. The different effects of scotomas due to loss of photoreceptors are left for follow-up work.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peli, E., Goldstein, R., & Jung, J. H. (2023). The Invisibility of Scotomas I: The Carving Hypothesis. Optometry and Vision Science, 100(8), 515–529. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002048

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free