Reintroducing radiometric surface temperature into the Penman-Monteith formulation

50Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Here we demonstrate a novel method to physically integrate radiometric surface temperature (T R) into the Penman-Monteith (PM) formulation for estimating the terrestrial sensible and latent heat fluxes (H and λE) in the framework of a modified Surface Temperature Initiated Closure (STIC). It combines T R data with standard energy balance closure models for deriving a hybrid scheme that does not require parameterization of the surface (or stomatal) and aerodynamic conductances (g S and g B). STIC is formed by the simultaneous solution of four state equations and it uses T R as an additional data source for retrieving the "near surface" moisture availability (M) and the Priestley-Taylor coefficient (α). The performance of STIC is tested using high-temporal resolution T R observations collected from different international surface energy flux experiments in conjunction with corresponding net radiation (R N), ground heat flux (G), air temperature (T A), and relative humidity (R H) measurements. A comparison of the STIC outputs with the eddy covariance measurements of λE and H revealed RMSDs of 7-16% and 40-74% in half-hourly λE and H estimates. These statistics were 5-13% and 10-44% in daily λE and H. The errors and uncertainties in both surface fluxes are comparable to the models that typically use land surface parameterizations for determining the unobserved components (g S and g B) of the surface energy balance models. However, the scheme is simpler, has the capabilities for generating spatially explicit surface energy fluxes and independent of submodels for boundary layer developments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mallick, K., Boegh, E., Trebs, I., Alfieri, J. G., Kustas, W. P., Prueger, J. H., … Jarvis, A. J. (2015). Reintroducing radiometric surface temperature into the Penman-Monteith formulation. Water Resources Research, 51(8), 6214–6243. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016106

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free