Future strategy for soil investigations in quick clay areas

1Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The landslides at Rissa in 1978, and more recently at the Skjeggestad bridge in Norway, are devastating reminders of the potential threats related to quick clays. For a geotechnical engineering project it is hence important to determine if there is sensitive clay present and to clarify the extent of the quick clay deposit. Integration of geophysical and geotechnical methods has become more common in ground investigations nowadays, particularly in larger projects. In such integrated measurements, geotechnical engineers and geophysicists can cooperate, and by joint knowledge decide where geotechnical soundings, in situ tests and sampling should be located with optimal cost-efficiency. This paper describes how various investigation methods may be combined to achieve a successful strategy for detecting deposits of quick and sensitive clays. The methods presented herein include conventional soundings, CPTU and field vane test (FVT), supplemented by geophysical methods such as CPTU with resistivity measurements (R-CPTU), Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) and Airborne Electromagnetic Measurements (AEM).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sandven, R., Gylland, A. S., Montafia, A., Pfaffhuber, A. A., Kåsin, K., & Long, M. (2017). Future strategy for soil investigations in quick clay areas. In Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research (Vol. 46, pp. 497–507). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56487-6_44

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free