Complexities, confounders, and challenges in experimental stroke research: A checklist for researchers and reviewers

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The quest for internal and external validity in experimental stroke research is fraught with pitfalls and confounders. This article, written as a checklist from the perspective of an editor and reviewer of articles on rodent stroke models and an active bench side stroke researcher, presents a compilation of the common pitfalls and quality issues in experimental stroke research. These include selecting controls for genetically modifi ed animals, effects of stroke on systemic parameters (immunodepression, infection, cachexia, etc.), cerebral blood fl ow measurement, brain edema correction, study design, statistics, and interpretation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dirnagl, U. (2016). Complexities, confounders, and challenges in experimental stroke research: A checklist for researchers and reviewers. In Neuromethods (Vol. 120, pp. 317–331). Humana Press Inc. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-5620-3_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free