Exposure and Reactions to Cancer Treatment Misinformation and Advice: Survey Study

12Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Cancer treatment misinformation, or false claims about alternative cures, often spreads faster and farther than true information on social media. Cancer treatment misinformation can harm the psychosocial and physical health of individuals with cancer and their cancer care networks by causing distress and encouraging people to abandon support, potentially leading to deviations from evidence-based care. There is a pressing need to understand how cancer treatment misinformation is shared and uncover ways to reduce misinformation. Objective: We aimed to better understand exposure and reactions to cancer treatment misinformation, including the willingness of study participants to prosocially intervene and their intentions to share Instagram posts with cancer treatment misinformation. Methods: We conducted a survey on cancer treatment misinformation among US adults in December 2021. Participants reported their exposure and reactions to cancer treatment misinformation generally (saw or heard, source, type of advice, and curiosity) and specifically on social media (platform, believability). Participants were then randomly assigned to view 1 of 3 cancer treatment misinformation posts or an information post and asked to report their willingness to prosocially intervene and their intentions to share. Results: Among US adult participants (N=603; mean age 46, SD 18.83 years), including those with cancer and cancer caregivers, almost 1 in 4 (142/603, 23.5%) received advice about alternative ways to treat or cure cancer. Advice was primarily shared through family (39.4%) and friends (37.3%) for digestive (30.3%) and natural (14.1%) alternative cancer treatments, which generated curiosity among most recipients (106/142, 74.6%). More than half of participants (337/603, 55.9%) saw any cancer treatment misinformation on social media, with significantly higher exposure for those with cancer (53/109, 70.6%) than for those without cancer (89/494, 52.6%; P

References Powered by Scopus

Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning

1149Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Addressing Health-Related Misinformation on Social Media

580Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online

569Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Cancer misinformation on social media

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Women's Lived Experiences in the Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine for Breast Cancer Management: A Phenomenological Study

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Social media prompts to encourage intervening with cancer treatment misinformation

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lazard, A. J., Nicolla, S., Vereen, R. N., Pendleton, S., Charlot, M., Tan, H. J., … Dasgupta, N. (2023). Exposure and Reactions to Cancer Treatment Misinformation and Advice: Survey Study. JMIR Cancer, 9. https://doi.org/10.2196/43749

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

57%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

14%

Researcher 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 4

40%

Social Sciences 3

30%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

20%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free