Conservation implications of a mismatch between data availability and demographic impact

2Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Cost-effective use of limited conservation resources requires understanding which data most contribute to alleviating biodiversity declines. Interventions might reasonably prioritise life-cycle transitions with the greatest influence on population dynamics, yet some contributing vital rates are particularly challenging to document. This risks managers making decisions without sufficient empirical coverage of the spatiotemporal variation experienced by the species. Here, we aimed to explore whether the number of studies contributing estimates for a given life-stage transition aligns with that transition's demographic impact on population growth rate, λ. We parameterised a matrix population model using meta-analysis of vital rates for the common eider (Somateria mollissima), an increasingly threatened yet comparatively data-rich species of seaduck, for which some life stages are particularly problematic to study. Female common eiders exhibit intermittent breeding, with some established breeders skipping one or more years between breeding attempts. Our meta-analysis yielded a breeding propensity of 0.72, which we incorporated into our model with a discrete and reversible ‘nonbreeder’ stage (to which surviving adults transition with a probability of 0.28). The transitions between breeding and nonbreeding states had twice the influence on λ than fertility (summed matrix-element elasticities of 24% and 11%, respectively), whereas almost 15 times as many studies document components of fertility than breeding propensity (n = 103 and n = 7, respectively). The implications of such mismatches are complex because the motivations for feasible on-the-ground conservation actions may be different from what is needed to reduce uncertainty in population projections. Our workflow could form an early part of the toolkit informing future investment of finite resources, to avoid repeated disconnects between data needs and availability thwarting evidence-led conservation.

References Powered by Scopus

Introduction to Meta-Analysis

14605Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Program mark: Survival estimation from populations of marked animals

6225Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change

1591Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Assumptions about survival estimates and dispersal processes can have severe impacts on population viability assessments

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Annual variation of adult survival of a south-temperate House Wren population in Argentina

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nicol-Harper, A., Doncaster, C. P., Hilton, G. M., Wood, K. A., & Ezard, T. H. G. (2023). Conservation implications of a mismatch between data availability and demographic impact. Ecology and Evolution, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10269

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 5

71%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

14%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5

63%

Environmental Science 2

25%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free