Exploring predicate-argument relations for named entity recognition in the molecular biology domain

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper, the semantic relationships between a predicate and its arguments in terms of semantic roles are employed to improve lexical-based named entity recognition (NER) in the molecular biology domain. The semantic roles were realized in various sets of syntactic features used by a machine learning model to explore what should be the efficient way in allowing this knowledge to provide the highest positive effect on the NER. The empirical results show that the best feature set consists of predicate's surface form, predicate's lemma, voice, and the united feature of subject-object head's lemma and transitive-intransitive sense. The performance improvement from using these features indicates the advantage of the predicate-argument semantic knowledge on NER. There are still rooms to enhance NER by using this semantic knowledge (e.g. to employ other semantic roles besides agent and theme and to extend the rules for efficient identification of an argument's boundary). © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wattarujeekrit, T., & Collier, N. (2005). Exploring predicate-argument relations for named entity recognition in the molecular biology domain. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 3735 LNAI, pp. 267–280). https://doi.org/10.1007/11563983_23

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free