Background: Heparin has been used for years as a locking solution in totally implantable venous access devices. Normal saline (NS) might be a safe alternative for heparin. However, evidence of non-inferiority of NS versus heparin is lacking. Patients and methods: We randomly allocated 802 cancer patients with a newly inserted port either to heparin lock (300 U/3 ml) or to NS lock groups in a 1:1 assignment ratio. The primary outcome was the number of functional. © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved.
CITATION STYLE
Goossens, G. A., Jérôme, M., Janssens, C., Peetermans, W. E., Fieuws, S., Moons, P., … Stas, M. (2013). Comparing normal saline versus diluted heparin to lock non-valved totally implantable venous access devices in cancer patients: A randomised, non-inferiority, open trial. Annals of Oncology, 24(7), 1892–1899. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt114
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.