Breast fat volume measurement using wide-bore 3 T MRI: comparison of traditional mammographic density evaluation with MRI density measurements using automatic segmentation

7Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aim To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived breast density measurements using automatic segmentation algorithms with radiologist estimations using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (BI-RADS) density classification. Materials and methods Forty women undergoing mammography and dynamic breast MRI as part of their clinical management were recruited. Fat–water separated MRI images derived from a two-point Dixon technique, phase-sensitive reconstruction, and atlas-based segmentation were obtained before and after intravenous contrast medium administration. Breast density was assessed using software from Advanced MR Analytics (AMRA), Linköping, Sweden, with results compared to the widely used four-quartile quantitative BI-RADS scale. Results The proportion of glandular tissue in the breast on MRI was derived from the AMRA sequence. The mean unenhanced breast density was 0.31±0.22 (mean±SD; left) and 0.29±0.21 (right). Mean breast density on post-contrast images was 0.32±0.19 (left) and 0.32±0.2 (right). There was “almost perfect” correlation between pre- and post-contrast breast density quantification: Spearman's correlation rho=0.98 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.97–0.99; left) and rho=0.99 (95% CI: 0.98–0.99; right). The 95% limits of agreement were −0.11–0.08 (left) and −0.08–0.03 (right). Interobserver reliability for BI-RADS was “substantial”: weighted Kappa k=0.8 (95% CI: 0.74–0.87). The Spearman correlation coefficient between BI-RADS and MRI breast density was rho=0.73 (95% CI: 0.60–0.82; left) and rho=0.75 (95% CI: 0.63–0.83; right) which was also “substantial”. Conclusion The AMRA sequence provides a fully automated, reproducible, objective assessment of fibroglandular breast tissue proportion that correlates well with mammographic assessment of breast density with the added advantage of avoidance of ionising radiation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Petridou, E., Kibiro, M., Gladwell, C., Malcolm, P., Toms, A., Juette, A., … Denton, E. (2017). Breast fat volume measurement using wide-bore 3 T MRI: comparison of traditional mammographic density evaluation with MRI density measurements using automatic segmentation. Clinical Radiology, 72(7), 565–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2017.02.014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free