Empirical Modeling of the Redshift Evolution of the [ N II ] /Hα Ratio for Galaxy Redshift Surveys

  • Faisst A
  • Masters D
  • Wang Y
  • et al.
38Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We present an empirical parameterization of the [N ii ]/H α flux ratio as a function of stellar mass and redshift valid at 0 <  z  < 2.7 and 8.5 < 11.0 . This description can (i) easily be applied to simulations for modeling [N ii ] λ 6584 line emission, (ii) deblend [N ii ] and H α in current low-resolution grism and narrow-band observations to derive intrinsic H α fluxes, and (iii) reliably forecast the number counts of H α emission-line galaxies for future surveys, such as those planned for Euclid and the Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope ( WFIRST ). Our model combines the evolution of the locus on the Baldwin, Phillips & Terlevich (BPT) diagram measured in spectroscopic data out to z  ∼ 2.5 with the strong dependence of [N ii ]/H α on stellar mass and [O iii ]/H β observed in local galaxy samples. We find large variations in the [N ii ]/H α flux ratio at a fixed redshift due to its dependency on stellar mass; hence, the assumption of a constant [N ii ] flux contamination fraction can lead to a significant under- or overestimate of H α luminosities. Specifically, measurements of the intrinsic H α luminosity function derived from current low-resolution grism spectroscopy assuming a constant 29% contamination of [N ii ] can be overestimated by factors of ∼8 at log ( L ) > 43.0 for galaxies at redshifts z  ∼ 1.5. This has implications for the prediction of H α emitters for Euclid and WFIRST . We also study the impact of blended H α and [N ii ] on the accuracy of measured spectroscopic redshifts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Faisst, A. L., Masters, D., Wang, Y., Merson, A., Capak, P., Malhotra, S., & Rhoads, J. E. (2018). Empirical Modeling of the Redshift Evolution of the [ N II ] /Hα Ratio for Galaxy Redshift Surveys. The Astrophysical Journal, 855(2), 132. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aab1fc

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free