Physically demanding work and preterm delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

47Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Methods: A systematic search in Medline, Embase and Nioshtic for the period 1990 to June 2012 for observational and intervention studies on physically demanding work (prolonged standing, heavy lifting, physical exertion, occupational fatigue and demanding posture) and PTD. Selected studies were assessed for their risk of bias and pooled using a random effects model. Results of case–control and cohort studies were reported separately in subgroups. Objective: Physically demanding work may increase the risk of preterm delivery (PTD), defined as delivery before 37 weeks. We assessed the available evidence. Results: We found 10 studies with low risk of bias and seven studies with moderate risk of bias. Standing and walking at work during pregnancy for more than 3 h per day was associated with an increased risk for PTD [OR 1.3 (95 % CI 1.1–1.6)], just as lifting and carrying >5 kg [OR 1.3 (95 % CI 1.05–1.6)] or lifting and carrying in the third trimester of the pregnancy [OR 1.3 (95 % CI 1.01–1.8)]. Jobs that required physical effort or physical exertion were associated with an increased risk of PTD [OR 1.4 (95 % CI 1.19–1.66)]. Working during pregnancy in jobs with a combination of two or more physical tasks, physical effort or occupational fatigue was also associated with an increased risk of PTD [OR 1.5 (95 % CI 1.1–2.0)]. Conclusions: Physically demanding work during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of PTD, especially in jobs with a combination of tasks with physical effort. In general, only small to moderate elevations of risks were found.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Beukering, M. D. M., van Melick, M. J. G. J., Mol, B. W., Frings-Dresen, M. H. W., & Hulshof, C. T. J. (2014). Physically demanding work and preterm delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 87(8), 809–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-013-0924-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free