A framework for implementing and valuing biodiversity offsets in colombia: A landscape scale perspective

27Citations
Citations of this article
116Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Biodiversity offsets provide a mechanism for maintaining or enhancing environmental values in situations where development is sought, despite negative environmental impacts. They seek to ensure that unavoidable deleterious environmental impacts of development are balanced by environmental gains. When onsite impacts warrant the use of offsets there is often little attention paid to make sure that the location of offset sites provides the greatest conservation benefit, ensuring they are consistent with landscape level conservation goals. In most offset frameworks it is difficult for developers to proactively know the offset requirements they will need to implement. Here we propose a framework to address these needs. We propose a series of rules for selecting offset sites that meet the conservation needs of potentially impacted biological targets. We then discuss an accounting approach that seeks to support offset ratio determinations based on a structured and transparent approach. To demonstrate the approach, we present a framework developed in partnership with the Colombian Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development to reform existing mitigation regulatory processes. © 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Figures

  • Table 1. Pilot project site descriptions.
  • Table 2. Overview of offset ratio calculation. We based the ratio determination on an assessment of the amount of the ecological system currently within protected areas (Representation), the national-level and local-level rarity of the ecological system (Rarity), the percentage of the ecological system that remains relative to its historic distribution (Remanence) and the rate of loss for the ecological system calculated over the previous 6 years (Rate of Loss).
  • Figure 2. Map of offset ratio calculation which includes a summary of each of the four sub-scores and final combined scores for the entire country of Colombia. See Table 2 for detail on how values are combined.
  • Figure 3. Landscape-level recommendations for the application of the mitigation hierarchy in the Ceasr Valley pilot area. Portfolio of conservation sites selected by the ecoregional assessment in purple. Development potential outlined in red showing overlap between potential development and conservation priorities. Natural areas not within the conservation portfolio but requiring offsite mitigation shown in green. Bottom middle and right panel show required compensation ratio for impacts to natural systems and areas best suited to offset these impacts.

References Powered by Scopus

Systematic conservation planning

4477Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global mammal distributions, biodiversity hotspots, and conservation

374Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Policy development for biodiversity offsets: A review of offset frameworks

371Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The energy footprint: How oil, natural gas, and wind energy affect land for biodiversity and the flow of ecosystem services

144Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mitigation for one & all: An integrated framework for mitigation of development impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services

106Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Policy development for environmental licensing and biodiversity offsets in Latin America

81Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saenz, S., Walschburger, T., González, J. C., León, J., McKenney, B., & Kiesecker, J. (2013). A framework for implementing and valuing biodiversity offsets in colombia: A landscape scale perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 5(12), 4961–4987. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5124961

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2408162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 52

66%

Researcher 24

30%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

3%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 35

48%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25

34%

Social Sciences 7

10%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 6

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0