Austerity Measures and Underfunding of the Spanish Health System during the COVID-19 Pandemic—Perception of Healthcare Staff in Spain

9Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Insufficient pandemic preparedness and underfunding of human and economic resources have conditioned the response to COVID-19 in Spain. This underfunding has continued since the austerity measures introduced during the 2008 financial crisis. This study aims to understand the perceptions of healthcare staff in Spain on the relationship between the funding of the health system and its capacity to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. To this end, we carried out a thematic content analysis, based on 79 online semi-structured interviews with healthcare staff across the regions most affected by the COVID-19 first wave. Participants reported a lack of material resources, which had compromised the capacity of the health system before the pandemic. The lack of human resources was to be addressed by staff reorganisation, such as reinforcing hospital units to the detriment of primary health care. Staff shortages continued straining the COVID-19 response, even after material scarcities were later partially alleviated. Personnel shortages need to be adequately addressed in order to adequately respond to future health crises.

References Powered by Scopus

Your institution provides access to this article.

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Otero-García, L., Mateos, J. T., Esperato, A., Llubes-Arrià, L., Regulez-Campo, V., Muntaner, C., & Legido-Quigley, H. (2023). Austerity Measures and Underfunding of the Spanish Health System during the COVID-19 Pandemic—Perception of Healthcare Staff in Spain. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032594

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

43%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

29%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

14%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0