Engineering the Doctorate: Designing a Highway to Traverse

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The demand for university education is increasing from an elite to a mass to possibly a universal requirement. Universities have evolved to the point where an undergraduate coursework degree has similarities to a batch manufacturing process. The research degree, though, continues to resemble more closely a traditional craft paradigm. The undergraduate degree has structures that support navigation for the student and reliable delivery for the institution. The research degree is far less structured: each journey is individually crafted to produce a unique work of art that showcases a journeyman’s readiness to be admitted into the fellowship of scholars. This chapter applies a comparative case study methodology, comparing the undergraduate degree with a research degree, with data drawn from documents from the Australian government and an Australian university. The comparison applies both the logics of the discipline of Education and the logics of the discipline of Engineering. From an Education logic, the undergraduate degree most resembles systematic instruction and a research degree an apprenticeship. From an Engineering logic, they most resemble process and project systems respectively. The first-named author used the analysis in the case study to design and implement his doctoral journey. The chapter concludes with his reflections.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Somasundaram, J., & Howard, P. (2019). Engineering the Doctorate: Designing a Highway to Traverse. In Palgrave Studies in Education Research Methods (pp. 91–113). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23731-8_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free