Moral injury: Two perspectives

1Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

There is a growing awareness that the diagnosis and treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in military service members has not been an effective means of dealing with the psychological trauma of war. Mental health professionals who treat soldiers returning from Iraq and Afghanistan have perceived a disparity between soldiers’ psychological responses to combat and the officially identified cause of PTSD), which is fear. William Nash, who in 2004 served in Iraq as a combat psychiatrist, notes that after the Battle of Fallujah, not fear, but “survivor’s guilt, moral injury, [and] feeling betrayed by leaders” were the predominant reactions among soldiers.1.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Derwin, S. (2016). Moral injury: Two perspectives. In Traumatic Memories of the Second World War and After (pp. 47–65). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33470-7_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free