Understanding Immune Responses to Viruses—Do Underlying Th1/Th2 Cell Biases Predict Outcome?

25Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Emerging and re-emerging viral diseases have increased in number and geographical extent during the last decades. Examples include the current COVID-19 pandemic and the recent epidemics of the Chikungunya, Ebola, and Zika viruses. Immune responses to viruses have been well-characterised within the innate and adaptive immunity pathways with the outcome following viral infection predominantly attributed to properties of the virus and circumstances of the infection. Perhaps the belief that the immune system is often considered as a reactive component of host defence, springing into action when a threat is detected, has contributed to a poorer understanding of the inherent differences in an individual’s immune system in the absence of any pathology. In this review, we focus on how these host factors (age, ethnicity, underlying pathologies) may skew the T helper cell response, thereby influencing the outcome following viral infection but also whether we can use these inherent biases to predict patients at risk of a deviant response and apply strategies to avoid or overcome them.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Howard, F. H. N., Kwan, A., Winder, N., Mughal, A., Collado-Rojas, C., & Muthana, M. (2022, July 1). Understanding Immune Responses to Viruses—Do Underlying Th1/Th2 Cell Biases Predict Outcome? Viruses. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14071493

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free