Microbial biomass and enzymatic activities in sandy soil cultivated with lettuce inoculated with plant growth promoters

9Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Plant growth promoter microorganisms have been studied as important tools for increasing crop production. Lettuce is the most consumed hardwood crop in the world. Numerous microorganisms are capable of acting in a beneficial way in the growth of this culture. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of Trichoderma and Pseudomonas on the microbial biomass, enzymatic activities in sandy soil and lettuce production. The experimental design was completely randomized with ten replicates and treatments: CONT (absolute control); CM (control with cattle manure fertilization); CMB (with fertilization and Pseudomonas sp.); CMF (with fertilization and T. aureoviride) and CMBF (with fertilization and the two microorganisms combined). The fertilizer used was organic with cattle manure in a dose recommended for the culture. This study evaluated the production of lettuce, microbial biomass and the enzymatic activity of acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase and urease. The combined application of CMBF was efficient in increasing lettuce production, because it increased 85% of the cv. Veronica cultivated on sandy soil. The combined use of plant growth promoting microorganisms resulted to an increase in microbial biomass. In lettuce crops, it is recommended to use T. aureoviride URM 5158 and Pseudomonas sp. UAGF 14 in lettuce crops, because improved lettuce production, improves the biochemical quality of soils measured by absolute and specific enzymatic activities per unit of microbial biomass.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moraes, M. D. C. H. dos S., De Medeiros, E. V., De Andrade, D. D. S., De Lima, L. D., Santos, I. C. D. S., & Filho, A. P. M. (2018). Microbial biomass and enzymatic activities in sandy soil cultivated with lettuce inoculated with plant growth promoters. Revista Caatinga, 31(4), 860–870. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252018V31N408RC

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free