From Objective to Subjective Difficulty Evaluation in Video Games

9Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper describes our research investigating the perception of difficulty in video games, defined as players’ estimation of their chances of failure. We discuss our approach as it relates to psychophysical studies of subjective difficulty and to cognitive psychology research into the overconfidence effect. The starting point for our study was the assumption that the strong motivational pull of video games may lead players to become overconfident, and thereby underestimate their chances of failure. We design and implement a method for an experiment using three games, each representing a different type of difficulty, wherein players bet on their capacity to succeed. Our results confirm the existence of a gap between players’ actual and self-evaluated chances of failure. Specifically, players seem to underestimate high levels of difficulty. The results do not show any influence on difficulty underestimation from the players gender, feelings of self-efficacy, risk aversion or gaming habits.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Constant, T., Levieux, G., Buendia, A., & Natkin, S. (2017). From Objective to Subjective Difficulty Evaluation in Video Games. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 10514 LNCS, pp. 107–127). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67684-5_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free