Cost-effectiveness/cost-benefit analysis of newborn screening for severe combined immune deficiency in Washington State

43Citations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the expected cost-effectiveness and net benefit of the recent implementation of newborn screening (NBS) for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in Washington State. Study design We constructed a decision analysis model to estimate the costs and benefits of NBS in an annual birth cohort of 86 600 infants based on projections of avoided infant deaths. Point estimates and ranges for input variables, including the birth prevalence of SCID, proportion detected asymptomatically without screening through family history, screening test characteristics, survival rates, and costs of screening, diagnosis, and treatment were derived from published estimates, expert opinion, and the Washington NBS program. We estimated treatment costs stratified by age of identification and SCID type (with or without adenosine deaminase deficiency). Economic benefit was estimated using values of $4.2 and $9.0 million per death averted. We performed sensitivity analyses to evaluate the influence of key variables on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of net direct cost per life-year saved. Results Our model predicts an additional 1.19 newborn infants with SCID detected preclinically through screening, in addition to those who would have been detected early through family history, and 0.40 deaths averted annually. Our base-case model suggests an ICER of $35 311 per life-year saved, and a benefit-cost ratio of either 5.31 or 2.71. Sensitivity analyses found ICER values

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ding, Y., Thompson, J. D., Kobrynski, L., Ojodu, J., Zarbalian, G., & Grosse, S. D. (2016). Cost-effectiveness/cost-benefit analysis of newborn screening for severe combined immune deficiency in Washington State. In Journal of Pediatrics (Vol. 172, pp. 127–135). Mosby Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.01.029

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free